Hi all,
First time posting here. I'm having a bit of a mystery I'm trying to research – the curious case of Carl Sundberg, a rather adventurous Swede. This all started when I was offered to purchase a Distinguished Conduct Medal, Edward VII issue, named to a Sergeant Major Carl Sundberg of the Cape Mounted Rifles. The medal in itself has been deemed to be an original, but the provenance is somewhat more uncertain. While the engraving looks to be rather standard, if I compare with the ww1 issues (which is my main collecting area) I have not been able to find him in any of the lists of recipients of the DCM during the Boer War. However, as I am a Swede myself, the existence of a potential Swedish DCM recipient is of course of great interest to me.
Carl Sundberg existed and lived a rather interesting life. In short, he had joined the French Foreign Legion in the late 1800:s. From there, he deserted and arrived in Cape Town in 1893 where he was enrolled into the Bechuanaland Border Police. The year after, he instead joined the Cape Mounted Rifles in Kingwilliamstown – apparently, he served in an artillery unit connected to the CMR.
At first, I naturally assumed that he must have gotten his hands on the DCM and awarded it to himself. It would not be the first time a rather adventurous man would award himself medals to make himself seem more interesting, was my take on it.
However, I then found his Certificate of Discharge and now I’m not so certain anymore. According to the document he was discharged in September 1902 due to “Time expired”. What I noticed was that his listed name is “Carl Sundberg D.S.M”. Under his awards and decorations, the plot thickens; his QSA with clasps, as well as his KSA with clasps, and some other medals are correctly listed together with his French awards. But then there is also a notice of a "D.S Medal."
Had it been a ww1 group it would have been case closed – however, as the DSM was not introduced until 1914 I’m not so certain. Could it be that he received the DCM but it was wrongfully written as DSM in his papers? Is the DSM anything else that I have missed completely?
Any theories, speculations or clarities you may offer would be much appreciated.
Thank you for a great forum!