Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC:

Thomas Darby 1 year 4 months ago #86838

  • JacobLewis94
  • JacobLewis94's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Fresh recruit
  • Fresh recruit
  • Posts: 8
  • Thank you received: 0
Yes I've seen the unit information on this website and it says "G Darby" again which is a typo same as the Worcestershire Regiment website. Not sure if there's also a typo in In Memoriam by S Watt as this has been noted as the source. The original records I have are pretty clear it's a "T" but hey ho...! Thanks for your help.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Thomas Darby 1 year 3 months ago #87571

  • Smethwick
  • Smethwick's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 708
  • Thank you received: 766
From the Worcester Chronicle of 19th July 1902.

Right place, right date, correct Regiment and Battalion but wrong number & initial! Looking back 120 years is a fraught and imperfect process. At least it adds a cause of death.

Attachments:
The following user(s) said Thank You: JacobLewis94

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Thomas Darby 1 year 3 months ago #87573

  • JacobLewis94
  • JacobLewis94's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Fresh recruit
  • Fresh recruit
  • Posts: 8
  • Thank you received: 0
Yes I did find this out! Thought it was typical but at least they for thr surname right! Thanks for sharing

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Moderators: djb
Time to create page: 0.433 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum