I have now finished reading Thomas Packenham's book on the Boer War. He does return to the politics at the end of the book, mainly to do with the terms of surrender and the British Army politics!!!

Overall, I enjoyed the book; his analysis of the politics is important and if I may make the comparison, better than Conan - Doyle s whose politics are a little bias.
I did find though that Conan - Doyle covered every engagement whereas Packenham omits a lot and even references Conan - Doyle!
But having said that, Packenham, in his account of certain battles, gives excellent accounts and has obviously done a lot of research. I do think that you have to read both books to get a real overview of the whole conflict.
Just my opinion, I'm not a book critic
I'm now going to start Ruari Chisholm's account of the siege of ladysmith and I'm looking forward to it!
Iain