The news of Dr. Jameson's surrender was received in Johannesburg towards
mid-day, at first with derision, but as report after report came in, each
confirming and supplementing the other, no room for doubt was left and a
scene of the wildest excitement ensued. It is not too much to say that not
one person in a hundred, no matter what his political leanings were, had
doubted for a moment Dr. Jameson's ability to force his way into
Johannesburg. There is not the slightest indication in the newspapers of the
time, which without doubt reflected every varying mood and repeated every
rumour which it was possible to catch from an excited people, that there was
in any man's mind a suspicion that the Boers would be able to stop the
invader. In the first place no one believed that they could mobilize
sufficiently quickly to oppose him, and in the second place, he was
understood to have a force of 800 men so admirably equipped and trained that
it would not be possible for 5,000 Boers hurriedly called together to
intercept him. All this, however, was forgotten when it came to accounting
for the disaster; or rather, the previous convictions only added strength to
the rage of disappointment. The public by that time knew of the letter of
invitation; it had been taken on the battle-field and news of it was
telegraphed in, and apart from this the writers had made no secret of it.
But what the public did not know, and what, if they had known it, would not
have appealed with similar force, was the efforts made to stop Jameson and
the practical withdrawal of the letter before he had
started. It was sufficient for them during the few remaining hours of that
day to recall that Jameson had come in, that he had fought against great
odds, and that when almost reaching his goal he had been taken prisoner for
want of assistance. It is perfectly true that in their rage of grief and
disappointment men were willing to march out with pick-handles to rescue
him, if there were not rifles enough to arm them. While the excitement
lasted this was the mood, and the Reform Committee were the scapegoats. The
attitude of the crowd was due to ignorance of the circumstances and natural
emotion which could not be otherwise vented. The excitement had greatly
abated by the following morning, and it was realized then that the position
was practically but little worse than that which the Reform Committee had
offered to take up when they tendered their persons as security for the
evacuation of the country by the invading force, and had proposed to
continue the struggle without their aid.
The reports received by the Johannesburg people were to the effect that
the surrender had been conditional upon the sparing of the lives of the
force. Indeed the first reports agreed that Jameson upon receipt of the High
Commissioner's proclamation, had laid down his arms; but upon the return of
Mr. Lace (whose mission has been explained) it was realized that this was
not the case. A later account showed that Jameson had surrendered to
Commandant Cronjé on the condition that the lives of all should be spared,
and this version of the surrender was published in the Johannesburg
newspapers. When further accounts were received from Pretoria and
Krugersdorp, stating that the surrender had been unconditional and that
there was grave doubt as to what would be done with Dr. Jameson, it was
surmised as an explanation that he had declined to bargain for his own life
and had merely stipulated that those of his followers should be spared.
On Friday the news that it was contemplated to shoot Dr. Jameson caused a
frenzy of horror and excitement in the town. Every effort was made by the
Reform Committee and its supporters to maintain strictly the position which
the Government had suggested through their Commission on
Wednesday, lest some untoward incident should turn the trembling balance
against Dr. Jameson and his men; nor were the Committee alone in the desire
to maintain that position. On Friday and on Saturday communications were
received from the local Government officials, and from Commandant-General
Joubert through the British Agent, drawing the attention of the Committee to
alleged breaches of the arrangement. The allegations were satisfactorily
disproved; but the communications clearly indicated that the Government were
most desirous of maintaining the position in relation to Johannesburg which
they had laid down before the first battle with Dr. Jameson's forces.
Information was received on Thursday that the High Commissioner would
leave Capetown for Pretoria at 9 p.m. that night. It had been a matter of
surprise that, the arrangement having been entered into with him early on
Wednesday, he had not found it convenient to start for some thirty-six
hours. Considering how seriously he had interfered with the movement—first
by his proclamation, and next by concerted action with the Government for a
peaceful settlement—it had been naturally assumed that he would not lose a
moment in leaving Capetown for the scene of trouble. Such however was not
the case.
It has been alleged that the arrangement made between the Transvaal
Government and the High Commissioner with a view to a peaceful settlement
bore only upon Dr. Jameson's action, and that it was not contemplated that
there should be any interference between the Government and its own subjects
in Johannesburg. In answer to this it may be noted that the High
Commissioner had in the first place offered his services, and that those
services had been declined by the Transvaal Government; but that the latter,
on realizing the seriousness of the position which they were called upon to
face, and acting, it is stated, upon the advice of Mr. J.H. Hofmeyr, the
recognized leader of the Dutch Africanders in the Cape Colony, reconsidered
this refusal and urgently besought the High Commissioner to go up to
Pretoria and use his influence to effect a peaceful settlement. This
arrangement, together with the promise of the redress of grievances, had
been made known to the deputation of the Reform Committee
by the Government Commission in Pretoria, as has already been stated—the
Government well knowing that Johannesburg was in arms and a party to the
arrangement with Dr. Jameson.
Dr. Jameson surrendered at 9.30 a.m. on Thursday. The High Commissioner
did not leave Capetown until 9 p.m. the same day. There had therefore been
ample time for the Government to intimate to him their opinion that matters
had been satisfactorily settled and that they did not need his services any
longer, had they held such an opinion. As a matter of fact, that was by no
means their opinion. They considered that they had yet to deal with 20,000
armed men in Johannesburg, and that they had to do that, if possible,
without provoking a civil war, which would inevitably result in the long-run
to their disadvantage, however great their success might be over the
Johannesburg people in the meantime. They not only allowed the High
Commissioner to proceed to Pretoria on the understanding originally
effected, but they took steps to remind the Reform Committee on several
occasions that they were expected to adhere to the arrangement entered into.
And such was the position when the High Commissioner arrived on the night of
Saturday, the 4th.
Sir Hercules Robinson proceeded direct to Pretoria, but did not transact
any business until Monday, abstaining, in deference to the feelings of the
Boers, from any discussion of business matters on the Sabbath. On Sunday,
however, he received information from the Reform Committee as to the
arrangements entered into with the Government. He was also informed that
threats had been made by persons who without doubt were speaking the mind of
the Government, that if any trouble should take place with Johannesburg Dr.
Jameson and probably many of his comrades would be shot. It was not stated
that the Transvaal Government or authorities would officially countenance
any such act or would authorize it even as the result of a trial; but the
statement which was made by everyone from the President downward was that,
in the event of any fighting in Johannesburg, the burghers would be so much
enraged and so beyond control that the prisoners who had caused all the
trouble would inevitably be shot. It is a part of Boer
diplomacy to make as much use as possible of every weapon that comes to hand
without too great a regard for the decencies of government as they occur to
the minds of every civilized people, and it is not at all unusual to find
the President proclaiming at one moment that some course must be taken to
prevent disaster, for the reason that he cannot be answerable for his
burghers in their excited state, and at another moment indignantly
repudiating the suggestion that they would be guilty of any step that could
be considered unworthy of the most civilized of peoples. In fact such
exhibitions were repeatedly given by him at a later stage when dealing with
the Reform prisoners.
Before any communication was received from the High Commissioner on
Monday messages had been received by the members of the Reform Committee to
the effect that the laying down of arms would be absolutely necessary to
ensure the safety of Jameson and his men. The Reform Committee had then
learnt that the two messengers sent to stop Dr. Jameson—Major Heany and
Captain Holden—had reached him, and had come in with him, and were at that
moment prisoners with him in Pretoria. They had also heard of the reception
accorded to Sir Jacobus de Wet's despatch and the High Commissioner's
proclamation, so that it was abundantly clear that the incursion had been
made in defiance of the wishes of the leaders, whatever other reasons there
might have been to prompt it. But the public who constituted the movement
were still under the impression that Dr. Jameson was a very fine fellow who
had come in in a chivalrous manner to help those whom he had believed to be
in distress. There was however no division of opinion as to what should be
done; even those who felt most sore about the position in which they had
been placed did not hesitate for a moment. The first and for the time being
the only consideration was the safety of Dr. Jameson and his comrades.
The events and negotiations of the days preceding the arrest of the
Reformers have been the subject of so much discussion and so much
misunderstanding that it will be better as far as possible to compile the
history from original documents or the published and properly authenticated
copies. In Blue Book [C. 7,933] the following is published:
SIR HERCULES ROBINSON (Pretoria) to
MR. CHAMBERLAIN.
(Telegraphic. Received 1.8 a.m.,
6th January, 1896.)
5th January. No.
3.—Arrived here last night. Position of affairs very critical. On side
of Government of South African Republic and of Orange Free State there
is a desire to show moderation, but Boers show tendency to get out of
hand and to demand execution of Jameson. I am told that Government of
South African Republic will demand disarmament of Johannesburg as a
condition precedent to negotiations. Their military preparations are now
practically complete, and Johannesburg, if besieged, could not hold out,
as they are short of water and coal. On side of Johannesburg leaders
desire to be moderate, but men make safety of Jameson and concession of
items in manifesto issued conditions precedent to disarmament. If these
are refused, they assert they will elect their own leaders and fight it
out in their own way. As the matter now stands, I see great difficulty
in avoiding civil war; but I will do my best, and telegraph result of my
official interview to-morrow. It is said that President of South African
Republic intends to make some demands with respect to Article No. 4 of
the London Convention of 1884.
MR. CHAMBERLAIN to SIR HERCULES
ROBINSON.
(Telegraphic. January 6, 1896.)
6th January. No. 3.—It is
reported in the press telegrams the President of the South African
Republic on December 30 held out definite hopes that concessions would
be proposed in regard to education and the franchise. No overt act of
hostility appears to have been committed by the Johannesburg people
since the overthrow of Jameson. The statement that arms and ammunition
are stored in that town in large quantities may be only one of many
boasts without foundation. Under these circumstances, active measures
against the town do not seem to be urgently required at the present
moment, and I hope no step will be taken by the President of the South
African Republic liable to cause more bloodshed and excite civil war in
the Republic.
These are followed in the same volume by No. 89:
SIR HERCULES ROBINSON (Pretoria) to
MR. CHAMBERLAIN.
(Telegraphic. Received 7th
January, 1896.)
6th January. No. 2.—Met
President South African Republic and Executive Council to-day. Before
opening proceedings, I expressed on behalf of Her Majesty's Government
my sincere regret at the unwarrantable raid made by Jameson; also
thanked Government of South African Republic for the moderation shown
under trying circumstances. With regard to Johannesburg, President of
South African Republic announced decision of Government to be that
Johannesburg must lay down its arms unconditionally as a precedent to
any discussion and consideration of grievances. I endeavoured to obtain
some indication of the steps that would be taken in the event of
disarmament, but without success, it being intimated that Government of
South African Republic had nothing more to say on this subject than had
been already embodied in proclamation of President of South African
Republic. I inquired as to whether any decision had been come to as
regards disposal of prisoners, and received a reply in the negative.
President of South African
Republic said that, as his burghers, to number of 8,000, had been
collected, and could not be asked to remain indefinitely, he must
request a reply, 'Yes' or 'No,' to this ultimatum within twenty-four
hours. I have communicated decision of South African Republic to Reform
Committee at Johannesburg through British Agent in South African
Republic.
The burgher levies are in such an excited state over
the invasion of their country that I believe President of South African
Republic could not control them except in the event of unconditional
surrender. I have privately recommended them to accept ultimatum.
Proclamation of President of South African Republic refers to promise to
consider all grievances which are properly submitted, and to lay the
same before the Legislature without delay.
On January 7 Mr. Chamberlain replied:
No. 1.—I approve of your advice to Johannesburg. Kruger
will be wise not to proceed to extremities at Johannesburg or elsewhere;
otherwise the evil animosities already aroused may be dangerously
excited.
And on the same day Sir Hercules Robinson telegraphed:
No. 1.—Your telegram of January 6, No. 2. It would be
most inexpedient to send troops to Mafeking at this moment, and there is
not the slightest necessity for such a step, as there is no danger from
Kimberley volunteer corps or from Mafeking. I have sent De Wet with
ultimatum this morning to Johannesburg, and believe arms will be laid
down unconditionally. I understand in such case Jameson and all
prisoners will be handed over to me. Prospect now very hopeful if no
injudicious steps are taken. Please leave matter in my hands.
On Monday Sir Jacobus de Wet, acting under the instructions of the High
Commissioner, telegraphed from Pretoria to the Reform Committee,
Johannesburg, informing them that the High Commissioner had seen the
President and Executive that morning, that he had been informed that as a
condition precedent to the discussion and consideration of grievances the
Government required that the Johannesburg people should lay down their arms;
and that the Government gave them twenty-four hours—from 4 p.m. that day—in
which to accept or reject that ultimatum. The Committee replied that it
would receive their earnest consideration.
Notwithstanding the fact that such a condition had been anticipated the
ultimatum was very unfavourably received, a large number of those present
protesting that the Uitlanders were being led little by little into a trap,
that the Boers as was their wont would never keep faith with them, that in
the end they would find themselves betrayed, and that it
would be better at no matter what cost to make a fight for it and attempt to
rescue Dr. Jameson and his party. The last suggestion was a mad one, and
after some consideration, and hearing the representations of Sir Sidney
Shippard and Mr. Seymour Fort, who had been in communication with the High
Commissioner on the previous day in Pretoria and were used by him as
unofficial agents, the matter was more calmly considered by the Committee.
It was very well realized that a struggle between Johannesburg and the Boer
forces would have been an absolutely hopeless one for those who took part in
it, but there was a determination to secure the objects for the attainment
of which the agitation had been started, and it was believed that if a firm
stand were taken, such was the justice of the cause of the Uitlanders that
the Government would not be able to refuse definite terms as to what reforms
they would introduce, besides assuring the safety of Dr. Jameson.
While the discussion was proceeding another telegram was received from
the British Agent saying that, under instructions from the High
Commissioner, he was proceeding in person to Johannesburg to meet the Reform
Committee and explain matters to them. The meeting took place on the morning
of Tuesday, and Sir Jacobus de Wet pointed out to the Committee the perilous
position in which Dr. Jameson and his comrades were placed, owing to the
hesitation of the Uitlanders to accept the ultimatum of the Government. He
read again and again the following telegram from the High Commissioner,
which had been despatched from Pretoria early that morning and received by
the British Agent in Johannesburg when on his way to meet the Reform
Committee:
Urgent.—You should inform
the Johannesburg people that I consider that if they lay down their arms
they will be acting loyally and honourably, and that if they do not
comply with my request they forfeit all claim to sympathy from Her
Majesty's Government and from British subjects throughout the world, as
the lives of Jameson and the prisoners are now practically in their
hands.
In reply to remarks about grievances, Sir Jacobus de Wet stated that the
Uitlanders could not expect under the circumstances
anything more favourable than the discussion and consideration of the
grievances with the High Commissioner, as had been promised, and added that,
if there were any spirit of reason in the community at all, they would be
content to leave their case in the hands of so experienced a statesman as
Sir Hercules Robinson, a man whose instinct and training were towards fair
and decent government.
In the course of a very long discussion, Sir Jacobus de Wet was asked if
he did not consider the Boer Government capable of an act of treachery such
as disarming the community and then proceeding to wreak their vengeance upon
those whom they might consider responsible for the agitation. According to
the evidence of a number of those who were present, his reply was that 'not
a hair of the head of any man in Johannesburg would be touched.' The
discussion was resumed at various times and in various forms, when different
groups of men had opportunities of questioning the British Agent themselves.
When questioned again more definitely as to whether this immunity would be
extended to the leaders—those who had signed the letter—Sir Jacobus de Wet
replied again in the affirmative. To another member, who had asked the same
question in another form, he said 'Not one among you will lose his personal
liberty for a single hour. John Bull would never allow it.' In reply to the
remark, 'John Bull has had to put up with a good deal in this country. What
do you mean by "John Bull"?' he answered, 'I mean the British Government
could not possibly allow such a thing.'
It would have been an easy and no doubt a proper and reasonable
precaution had the Reformers insisted upon a statement in writing of the
terms upon which they laid down their arms. There were however two
considerations which weighed against any bargain of this sort. The first was
the overwhelming and paramount consideration of insuring Dr. Jameson's
safety; and the other was the belief (not seriously shaken by suggestions to
the contrary) that the Government would be obliged to abide by the spirit of
the terms arranged on January 1, because the High Commissioner would insist
upon it as the vital condition under which he was endeavouring to effect the
disarmament of Johannesburg. That Sir Hercules Robinson
well realized his responsibility to the Uitlander, but found it inconvenient
or impossible to accept it at a later stage, is shown by his own reports. On
January 7 he telegraphed to Mr. Chamberlain as follows:
Your telegram No. 3 of January 6. I need now only say
that I have just received a message from Reform Committee resolving to
comply with demand of South African Republic to lay down their arms; the
people placing themselves (? and) their interests unreservedly in my
hands in the fullest confidence that I will see justice done to them. I
have received also the following from British agent, dated 7th January:
Begins: I have sent the
following telegram to His Honour the President:
I have met the Reform Committee. Am gratified with the
spirit shown in the discussion of the all-important present position.
The Committee handed me the following resolution—Begins: The
Reform Committee in Johannesburg, having seriously considered the
ultimatum of the Government of the South African Republic communicated
to them through Her Majesty's Agent at Pretoria, in a telegram dated 6th
instant, to the effect that Johannesburg must lay down its arms as a
condition precedent to a discussion and consideration of grievances,
have unanimously decided to comply with this demand, and have given
instructions to the citizens employed by this Committee for maintaining
good order to lay down their arms. In coming to this determination, the
Committee rely upon the Government that it will maintain law and order,
and protect life and property in this town at this critical juncture.
The Committee have been actuated by a paramount desire to do everything
possible to ensure the safety of Dr. Jameson and his men, to advance
the amicable discussion of terms of settlement with the Government, and
to support the High Commissioner in his efforts in this respect. The
Committee would draw the attention of the Government of the Republic to
the presence of armed burgher forces in the immediate vicinity of this
town, and would earnestly desire that these forces be removed in order
to avoid all risk of any disturbance of the public peace. Resolution
ends. I wish to add to my above remarks that I feel convinced there
will be no further difficulty in connection with the laying down of
their arms. I would suggest that the Government co-operate with the
Reform Committee for a day or two for the purpose of restoring the town
to its normal state. This will only take a day or two, and those who are
excited among the people will by that time have calmed down, and the
police can resume their ordinary duties. The Committee will co-operate
in this matter. This course will very much facilitate the task of your
Government if it meets with your approval. Ends.
The High Commissioner concluded the above telegram with the following
significant sentence:
I hope now to be able to confer with President of the
South African Republic and Executive Council as to prisoners and the
redress of Johannesburg grievances.
On the 8th he again telegraphed:
Referring to your telegram of the 7th inst., No. 1, I
consider that so far throughout this matter Kruger has behaved very
well. He suspended hostilities pending my arrival, when Johannesburg was
at his mercy; and in opposition to a very general feeling of the
Executive Council and of the burghers who have been clamouring for
Jameson's life, he has now determined to hand over Jameson and the other
prisoners. If Jameson had been tried here there can be no doubt that he
would have been shot, and perhaps some of his colleagues also. The
excitement of the public is now calmed down.I
shall try to-day to make arrangements with Kruger as to taking over the
prisoners, and I will confer with him as to redressing the grievances
of the residents of Johannesburg on the basis of your telegram of the
4th inst. I have given Kruger a copy of that telegram.'
And later on the same day:
Since my telegram No. 1 of this morning, matters have not
been going so smoothly. When the Executive Council met, I received a
message that only 1,814 rifles and three Maxim guns had been
surrendered, which the Government of the South African Republic did not
consider a fulfilment of the ultimatum, and orders would be immediately
issued to a commando to attack Johannesburg. I at once replied that the
ultimatum required the surrender of guns and ammunition for which no
permit of importation had been obtained, and that onus rested with
Transvaal Government to show that guns and ammunition were concealed for
which no permit had been issued. If before this was done any hostile
step were taken against Johannesburg, I should consider it to be a
violation of the undertaking for which I had made myself personally
responsible to the people of Johannesburg, and I should leave the issue
in hands of Her Majesty's Government. This had a sobering effect, and
the order for the attack on Johannesburg was countermanded, and it was
arranged that the Transvaal officials should accompany Her Majesty's
Agent to Johannesburg and point out to him if they could where arms were
concealed. Her Majesty's Agent left at 1 p.m. to-day for Johannesburg
for this purpose.The explanation of the change,
I take it, is that Kruger has great difficulties to contend with among
his own people. The apparent object is to prove that people of
Johannesburg have not fulfilled the conditions which were to precede the
handing over of the prisoners and consideration of grievances. I should
not be surprised if, before releasing the prisoners or redressing
grievances, an attempt were now made to extort an alteration of the
London Convention of 1884, and the abrogation of Article No. 4 of that
instrument. I intend, if I find that the Johannesburg people have
substantially complied with the ultimatum, to insist on the fulfilment
of promises as regards prisoners and consideration of grievances,
and will not allow at this stage the introduction of any fresh
conditions as regards the London Convention of 1884. Do you approve?
The Reform Committee published the following official notice on Tuesday
afternoon:
The Reform Committee notify hereby
that all rifles issued for the defence of life and property in town and
the mines are to be returned at once to the Central Office in order to
enable the Committee to carry out the agreement with the Government,
upon the faithful observance of which so much is dependent.
The Committee desire to make it known that late last
night they received an intimation from Her Majesty's Agent in Pretoria
to the effect that the decision of the Government was that Johannesburg
must lay down its arms as a condition precedent to the discussion and
consideration of grievances.
The Committee met this morning to consider the
position, and it was unanimously resolved to accept the ultimatum of the
Government for reasons which the following communications sufficiently
explain:
Here followed the High Commissioner's telegram to Sir Jacobus de Wet,
urging disarmament, already given, and the following memorandum:
Sir Jacobus de Wet, Her Majesty's Agent at Pretoria, has
notified to the Committee that he has been officially informed by the
Government in Pretoria that upon Johannesburg laying down its arms Dr.
Jameson will be handed over to Her Majesty's High Commissioner.
By Order.
Johannesburg, 7th January.
The above is correct.
J.A. DE WET,
H.B.M. Agent.
The Committee can add nothing to the above, and feel
that there will not be one man among the thousands who have joined the
Reform movement who will not find it consistent with honour and humanity
to co-operate loyally in the carrying out of the Committee's decision.
By order of the Committee.
On Wednesday the investigations effected by the Government, with the aid
of the Reform Committee, established the fact that the ultimatum had been
complied with; but the juggling with Dr. Jameson's life continued for some
days. On Thursday the 9th the High Commissioner received a communication
from the President in which occurred the following sentence: 'As I had
already caused your Excellency to be informed, it is really my intention to
act in this sense (i.e., hand over Dr. Jameson and men), so that Dr.
Jameson and the British subjects who were under his command may then be
punished by her Majesty's Government, and I will make known to your
Excellency the final decision in this matter as soon as Johannesburg
shall have reverted to a condition of quietness and order.'
In the face of this and many other significant
messages and expressions which reached Sir Hercules Robinson, it is not to
be wondered at that he considered Dr. Jameson's life to be in peril, and
that he regarded, as he distinctly said he did, disarmament by Johannesburg
as the only means of saving him; but what is less pardonable is, that he did
not pin President Kruger to this, and demand an explanation when it became
known that Jameson and his men were secured by the conditions of the
surrender. The truth is that the wily old Boer President, by a species of
diplomacy which does not now commend itself to civilized people, managed to
jockey everybody with whom he had any dealings. He is much in the position
of a certain financier who, after a vain effort to justify his proceedings,
turned at last in desperation upon his critics and said: 'Well, I don't care
what view you hold of it. You can have the morality, but I've got the cash.'
Late in the evening of the 9th the following proclamation was published:
Whereas by resolution of the Government of the South
African Republic, dated Monday, the 6th of January, 1896, whereby to all
persons at Johannesburg and suburbs twenty-four hours were granted to
hand over and to lay down to the Government unconditionally all arms and
ammunition for which no permit could be shown, and
Whereas the said period of twenty-four hours has already
expired on Tuesday, the 7th of January, 1896, and whereas the so-called
Reform Committee and other British subjects have consented and decided
to comply unconditionally with the resolution of the Government, and
Whereas sundry persons already have laid down their
arms and ammunition, and have handed them over to the Government, and
Whereas the laying down and giving over of the said
arms and ammunition is still proceeding, and
Whereas it is desirable and proper that this be done
as soon as possible, and in a proper way, and that a term be fixed
thereto,
Now I, Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, State
President of the South African Republic, with the advice and consent of
the Executive Council, by virtue of Article 5 of their minutes, dated
9th January, 1896, proclaim that further time will be given for that
purpose until FRIDAY, the 10th JANUARY, 1896, at 6 p.m.
All persons or corporations with whom, after the
expiration of that period, arms or ammunition will be found, for which
no permit granted by Government can be shown, will be dealt with
according to law; and
Whereas the laying down and handing over of the said
arms and ammunition should have been effected unconditionally,
Now I further proclaim that all persons who have
already laid down and given over the said arms and ammunition, or who
shall have done so before Friday, the 10th January, 1896, at 6 p.m.,
shall be exempted from all prosecution, and will be forgiven for the
misdeeds that have taken place at Johannesburg and suburbs,
except all persons and corporations
who will appear to be the chief
offenders, ringleaders, leaders, instigators, and those who have caused
the rebellion at Johannesburg and suburbs.
Such persons and corporations shall have to answer for
their deeds before the legal and competent courts of this Republic.
I further proclaim that I will address the inhabitants
of Johannesburg to-morrow by a separate proclamation.
God save Land and People.
Given under my hand at the Government Office at
Pretoria on this Ninth Day of January, in the Year One Thousand Eight
Hundred and Ninety-six.
S.J.P. KRUGER,
State President.
C. VAN BOESCHOTEN,
Acting State Secretary.
The grim, cautious method of the President was never better illustrated
than by these proclamations and the concurrent actions. In no part of his
diplomatic career has he better stage-managed the business than he did here.
To the world at large these addresses commend themselves no doubt as
reasonable and moderate, and they establish a record which will always speak
for him when the chronology of events is lost; but the true worth of it all
is only appreciated when one realizes that the first proclamation extending
the time for disarmament, and promising amnesty to all except the leaders,
was not issued until two days after the Government had satisfied themselves
that the disarmament had been completed, and that it was deliberately held
back until the police and burghers were in the outskirts of the town ready
to pounce upon the men with whom they had been treating. It is an absolute
fact that the Reform Committee-men, who had offered to effect the peaceful
settlement seemingly desired by all parties, who had used every means in
their power to convince the Government that disarming was being effected in
a bonâ fide and complete manner, and who had themselves supplied the
Government in good faith with any documents they had showing the number of
guns and the amount of ammunition which had been at the disposal of the
Reform Committee, had not the remotest suspicion that an act of treachery
was in contemplation, nor any hint that the Government did not regard them
as amnestied by virtue of the negotiations; and it is a fact that when the
proclamation of the 9th was issued the detectives were waiting at the clubs,
hotels and houses to arrest the members of the Reform Committee,
and that the Reformers did not know of the proclamation
exempting them from the 'Forgive and Forget' until after they had been
seized.
On the 10th the address promised to the inhabitants of Johannesburg duly
appeared.
After reviewing recent events, it concluded with this appeal:
Now I address you with full confidence! Strengthen the
hands of the Government, and work together with them to make this
Republic a country where all inhabitants, so to say, live fraternally
together. For months and months I have thought which alterations and
emendations would be desirable in the Government of this State, but the
unwarrantable instigations, especially of the Press, have kept me back.
The same men who now appear in public as the leaders have demanded
amendments from me in a time and manner which they should not have dared
to use in their own country out of fear of the penal law. Through this
it was made impossible for me and my burghers, the founders of this
Republic, to take your proposals into consideration. It is my intention
to submit a draft law at the first ordinary session of the Volksraad,
whereby a municipality with a Mayor at its head will be appointed for
Johannesburg, to whom the whole municipal government of this town will
be entrusted. According to all constitutional principles, such a
municipal council should be appointed by the election of the
inhabitants. I ask you earnestly, with your hand upon your heart, to
answer me this question: Dare I, and should I, after all that has
happened, propose such to the Volksraad? What I myself answer to this
question is, I know that there are thousands in Johannesburg to whom I
can with confidence entrust this right to vote in municipal matters.
Inhabitants of Johannesburg, make it possible for the Government to
appear before the Volksraad with the motto, 'Forget and Forgive.'
(Signed) S.J.P. KRUGER,
State President.
One would think that anyone gifted with even a moderate sense of humour
would have been restrained by it from issuing a second proclamation on top
of the elaborate fooling of the first. Is it possible to imagine any other
community or any other Government in the world in which the ruler could
seriously set to work to promulgate two such proclamations, sandwiching as
they did those acts which may be regarded as the practical
expression—diametrically opposed to the published expression—of his
intentions?
In the meantime the negotiations concerning Dr. Jameson were dragging on.
After securing the disarmament of Johannesburg and getting rid of the
troublesome question of the disposal of Jameson, and after refusing for
several days (to quote the gist of the High Commissioner's telegram, Blue
Book No. 125 [C-7933]) to allow the necessary
arrangements for the deportation of the men to be made, Mr. Kruger suddenly
called upon the High Commissioner to have them removed at once, intimating
at the same time that it was the decision of the Executive that all the
prisoners, except the Transvaal and Free State subjects, whom he would
retain, should be sent to England to be tried according to English law. It
was pointed out that it was only contemplated to send the officers for
trial. To this Mr. Kruger replied: 'In such case the whole question must be
reconsidered.' The High Commissioner at once telegraphed for the decision of
Her Majesty's Government, stating that it was the opinion of Sir Jacobus de
Wet and Sir Graham Bower, who had represented him at the interview with the
Transvaal Government, that, if the whole lot were not sent home to be dealt
with according to English law, they would be tried in Pretoria, with a
result which he feared would be deplorable. To this Mr. Chamberlain replied:
Astonished that Council should hesitate to fulfil the
engagement which we understood was made by President with you, and
confirmed by the Queen, on the faith of which you secured disarmament of
Johannesburg. Any delay will produce worst impression here, and may lead
to serious consequences. I have already promised that all the leaders
shall be brought to trial immediately; but it would be absurd to try the
rank and file, who only obeyed orders which they could not refuse. If
desired we may however engage to bring to England all who are not
domiciled in South Africa; but we cannot undertake to bring all the rank
and file to trial, for that would make a farce of the whole proceedings,
and is contrary to the practice of all civilized Governments. As regards
a pledge that they shall be punished, the President will see on
consideration that although a Government can order a prosecution, it
cannot in any free country compel a conviction. You may remind him that
the murderers of Major Elliott, who were tried in the Transvaal in 1881,
were acquitted by a jury of burghers. Compare also the treatment by us
of Stellaland and other freebooters.
The result of this communication was that the President drew in his horns
and agreed that if the prisoners were deported to England he would be
satisfied to let the British Government decide which of them should be
prosecuted.
The success of his diplomatic methods had whetted his appetite, it would
appear. He was not content with the conditional surrender of Dr. Jameson,
nor—having suppressed the fact that it was conditional—with having used him
for the purpose of disarming Johannesburg; but, having
achieved both purposes, Mr. Kruger was still desirous of keeping him in
hand. This however was a length to which the British Government did not see
fit to go; but there is no evidence in the correspondence which has passed
tending to show that even then Sir Hercules Robinson perceived how he was
being made use of and played with by the President.
On the night of the 9th and the morning of the 10th, the members of the
Reform Committee to the number of about sixty were arrested and lodged in
gaol; and from this moment the High Commissioner appears to have erased them
from the tablets of his memory. On January 14 he telegraphed to Mr.
Chamberlain as follows:
I have received a letter from Government of South African
Republic, stating that, in their opinion, every reason exists for
assuming that the complications at Johannesburg are approaching to an
end, and that there need be no longer any fear of further bloodshed. The
President of the South African Republic and Executive Council tender to
me the warmest thanks of the Government of the South African Republic
for the assistance I have been able to render in preventing further
bloodshed, and their congratulations on the manner in which my object in
coming has been fulfilled. They tender also their cordial acknowledgment
of the services rendered by the British Agent at Pretoria, which I think
is fully deserved. The Volksraad met yesterday, and adjourned until May,
the only business transacted being a vote of thanks to the Orange Free
State and the High Commissioner for their efforts in promoting a
peaceful settlement, which was carried by acclamation. I now only await
settlement of prisoners' difficulty to leave for Capetown, where my
presence is urgently needed in consequence of change of Ministers.
Governor of Natal and General Cox are here, to whom I will give
instructions as to reception and disposal of prisoners as soon as I hear
from you.
To this Mr. Chamberlain telegraphed a most important reply on January 15:
I am left in great perplexity by your telegram No. 3, of
the 14th inst., and fear that some previous telegrams must have
miscarried. (Here follow directions to refer to a number of telegrams in
which Mr. Chamberlain had indicated the settlement which he anticipated,
the nature of the reforms which Sir Hercules Robinson was to secure, and
many inquiries as to the reason for the arrests of the reformers as
reported in the English papers.) I have received no reply to any of
these telegrams, but have assumed that negotiations were in progress
between the President and yourself.There can be
no settlement until the questions raised by these telegrams are disposed
of. The people of Johannesburg laid down their arms in the belief that
reasonable concessions would be arranged by
your intervention; and until these are granted, or are
definitely promised to you by the President, the root-causes of the
recent troubles will remain.
The President has again and again promised reform, and
especially on the 30th December last, when he promised reforms in
education and franchise; and grave dissatisfaction would be excited if
you left Pretoria without a clear understanding on these points. Her
Majesty's Government invite President Kruger, in the interests of the
South African Republic and of peace, to make a full declaration on these
matters. I am also awaiting a reply respecting the alleged wholesale
arrests of English, Americans and other nationalities, made after the
surrender of Johannesburg.
It will be your duty to use firm language, and to tell
the President that neglect to meet the admitted grievances of the
Uitlanders by giving a definite promise to propose reasonable
concessions would have a disastrous effect upon the prospects of a
lasting and satisfactory settlement.
Send me a full report of the steps that you have
already taken with regard to this matter, and of the further action that
you propose.
In the meantime Sir Hercules Robinson left Pretoria, satisfied that he
had done all that was necessary, and telegraphed to Mr. Chamberlain as
follows:
FROM THE HIGH COMMISSIONER en
route TO CAPETOWN.
15th January, 1896. No.
1.—Your telegram 13 January, No. 1, only reached me last night, after I
had left Pretoria. I could if you consider it desirable, communicate
purport to President of South African Republic by letter, but I myself
think such action would be inopportune at this moment. Nearly all
leading Johannesburg men are now in gaol, charged with treason against
the State, and it is rumoured that Government has written evidence of a
long-standing and widespread conspiracy to seize government of country
on the plea of denial of political privileges, and to incorporate the
country with that of British South Africa Company. The truth of these
reports will be tested in the trials to take place shortly in the High
Court, and meanwhile to urge claim for extended political privileges for
the very men so charged would be ineffectual and impolitic. President of
South African Republic has already promised municipal government to
Johannesburg, and has stated in a proclamation that all grievances
advanced in a constitutional manner will be carefully considered and
brought before the Volksraad without loss of time; but until result of
trials is known nothing of course will now be done.
Mr. Chamberlain replied to the above:
15th January. No.
5.—Referring to your telegram, No. 1, of the 15th January, see my
telegram No. 1 of to-day, which was sent before receipt of yours. I
recognize that the actual moment is not opportune for a settlement of
the Uitlanders' grievances, and that the position of the President of
the South African Republic may be an embarrassing one, but I do not
consider that the arrest of a few score individuals out of a population
of 70,000 or more, or the supposed existence of a plot
amongst that small minority, is a
reason for denying to the overwhelming majority of innocent persons
reforms which are just in themselves and expedient in the interests of
the Republic. Whatever may be said about the conduct of a few
individuals, nothing can be plainer than that the sober and industrious
majority refused to countenance any resort to violence, and proved their
readiness to obey the law and your authority. I hope, therefore, to hear
at an early date that you propose to resume discussion with President of
South African Republic on lines laid down in my previous telegrams. I do
not see that the matter need wait until the conclusion of the trial of
the supposed plotters. I am anxious to receive the information asked for
in my telegram No. 1 of the 14th January. Please communicate at once
with the President on this matter.
The following is the telegram to which allusion is made above:
14th January. No. 1.—Press
telegrams state numerous arrests of leading residents on the Rand,
including many Americans, Germans, and other nationalities. Fear that
number of these arrests of active managers, representatives, may
disorganize industry on the Rand. Wish to know of what accused, when
brought to trial, whether bail allowed, and what penalities prescribed
by law. Shall be glad to learn from President of South African Republic
what his intentions are in this matter, which affects the subjects of so
many States. Propose to communicate President's reply to American and
Belgian Governments, which have already asked us to take charge of
interests of their respective citizens.
Sir Hercules Robinson, replied:
15th January. No. 2.—Your
telegram of 14th January, No. 1. The accused are between fifty and sixty
in number, and are mostly members of the Reform Committee. They have
been arrested on charge of treason, and of seeking to subvert the State
by inviting the co-operation and entrance into it of an armed force. The
proceedings are based, I understand, on sworn information, and the
trials will take place before High Court. The accused are being well
treated, and are represented by able counsel. It is alleged that
Government has documentary evidence of a widespread conspiracy to seize
upon Government, and make use of the wealth of the country to
rehabilitate finances of British South Africa Company. On taking leave
of President of South African Republic, I urged on him moderation as
regards the accused, so as not to alienate the sympathy he now enjoys of
all right-minded persons. Bail is a matter entirely in the hands of
Attorney-General. The Government seem acting within their legal rights,
and I do not see how I can interfere. Mines are at work, and industry
does not seem to be disorganized.
While still on his way to Capetown, the High Commissioner telegraphed to
Mr. Chamberlain again in a manner indicating his complete abandonment of the
position taken up by him in relation to Johannesburg—in
fact, his repudiation of what his own words have recorded against him:
16th January. No. i.—Your
telegram of 15th January, No. 1, received. I cannot at this moment
follow the complications arising from supposed missing and crossing
telegrams, but can only say that no telegram which has reached me from
you has remained unanswered.No promise was made
to Johannesburg by me as an inducement to disarm, except that the
promises made in the President's previous proclamation would be adhered
to, and that Jameson and the other prisoners would not be transferred
until Johannesburg had unconditionally laid down its arms and
surrendered. I sent your long telegram of 4th January to President;
but the question of concessions to Uitlanders has never been discussed
between us. Pending result of coming trials, and the extent to which
Johannesburg is implicated in the alleged conspiracy to subvert the
State is made clear, the question of political privileges would not be
entertained by Government of the South African Republic.
He justified the change of policy in another communication addressed to
Mr. Chamberlain before he reached Capetown:
16th January. No. 3.—Your
telegram of the 15th January, No. 5. If you will leave the matter in my
hands, I will resume advocacy of Uitlanders' claims at the first
moment I think it can be done with advantage; the present moment is most
inopportune, as the strongest feeling of irritation and indignation
against the Uitlanders exists both amongst the Burghers and Members of
Volksraad of both Republics. Any attempt to dictate in regard to the
internal affairs of South African Republic at this moment would be
resisted by all parties in South Africa, and would do great harm.
I have already replied in my telegram of 15th January,
No. 2, in answer to your telegram of 14th January, No. 1, and I do not
think it possible to obtain further information at this stage, the
matter being sub judice.
Sir Hercules Robinson left Pretoria on the 14th, having resided within a
few hundred yards of Dr. Jameson and his comrades for a week, and of the
Reform prisoners for four days, without making any attempt whatever to
ascertain their circumstances or story. During that time his military
secretary called upon Dr. Jameson for the purpose of finding out details of
the prisoners and wounded of the force, but made no further inquiries. Dr.
Jameson's solicitor wrote to the Colonial Office on March 5:
MY DEAR FAIRFIELD,
You have probably seen the cable that has come to the
Diggers' News, giving the lie direct to Sir John Willoughby's
statement respecting terms of surrender.
I have seen Sir John again, and am
authorized by him to state, with regard to the criticism that it is
incredible that nothing should have been said by the officers when in
prison at Pretoria to anybody about the terms of surrender, that it must
be remembered that from the time of the surrender until they left Africa
none of them were allowed to make any communication. While in gaol they
were not allowed to see newspapers or to receive any news of what was
going on in Pretoria or elsewhere.
Sir J. Willoughby made a statement to the head gaoler
and other officials at the time of his arrival at the gaol when he was
searched and all his papers taken from him. He requested to be allowed
to keep the document signed by Cronjé, as it contained the terms of the
surrender, but received as answer that all papers must be taken and that
they would be returned afterwards. They were in fact taken and only
returned when the officers were removed from the gaol to go to Durban.
My clients did try to get a note through to
Johannesburg concealed in a matchbox. They paid twenty-five pounds to
get it through, and sent it within thirty-six hours of their arrival in
gaol, but they have never been able to ascertain whether it reached its
destination.
The gist of it was that they were all right. It never
occurred to the prisoners that neither the British Resident nor the High
Commissioner would be informed of the terms of the surrender, or that
they would not satisfy themselves on this point.
Sir Hercules Robinson might urge, in so far as Dr. Jameson's affair is
concerned, that he could not be expected to suspect a deception such as was
practised upon him; yet it does seem extraordinary that, being in Pretoria
for the purpose of negotiating for the disposal of Dr. Jameson and his
comrades, he should not have taken steps to ascertain what there was to be
said on their behalf, especially as on his own showing it was for the
greater part of the time a question of life and death for the leaders of the
force. It is even more difficult to understand why no effort should have
been made to communicate with the Reformers. The High Commissioner was
thoroughly well aware of the negotiations between them and the Government on
January 1. He had received communications by telegraph from the Reformers
before he left Capetown; he came up avowedly to settle their business; he
negotiated on their behalf and induced them to disarm; he witnessed their
arrest and confinement in gaol; yet not only did he not visit them himself,
nor send an accredited member of his staff to inquire into their case and
conditions, but Sir Jacobus de Wet alleges that he actually, in deference to
the wish of the President, desired the British Agent not to hold any
communication whatever with the prisoners during his (Sir
Hercules Robinson's) stay in Pretoria. Truly we have had many examples of
President Kruger's audacity, and of the success of it; but nothing to equal
this. That he demanded from Sir Hercules Robinson information as to the
objects of the Flying Squadron and the movements of British troops in
British territory, and succeeded in getting it, was a triumph; but surely
not on a par with that of desiring the High Commissioner not to hold
communication with the British subjects whom he, as the official
representative of their sovereign, had travelled a thousand miles to disarm,
and on whose behalf—ostensibly—he was there to negotiate.